“Let Me Assure You, The DNC Hack Wasn’t Even A Hack”

Kim Dotcom has once again chimed in on the DNC hack, following a Sunday morning tweet from President Trump clarifying his previous comments on Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Kim Dotcom born Kim Schmitz, is a German-Finnish Internet entrepreneur and political activist who resides in Auckland, New Zealand.

Breaking News

Be the first to know when big news breaks


He achieved notoriety in Germany as a teen hacker who received a two-year suspended


sentence for selling identities that he had siphoned from telephone operators’ client database.

I never said Russia did not meddle in the election, I said “it may be Russia, or China or another country or group, or it may be a 400 pound genius sitting in bed and playing with his computer.” The Russian “hoax” was that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia – it never did!

In response, Dotcom tweeted “Let me assure you, the DNC hack wasn’t even a hack. It was an insi

der with a memory stick. I know this because I know who did it and why” adding “Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied. 360 pounds!” alluding of course to Trump’s “400 pound genius” comment.


Dotcom’s assertion is backed up by an analysis done last year by a researcher who goes by the name Forensicator, who determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s – a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network – yet a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick.

The local transfer theory of course blows the Russian hacking narrative out of the water, lending credibility to the theory that the DNC “hack” was in


fact an inside job, potentially implicating late DNC IT staffer, Seth Rich.

John Podesta’s email was allegely successfully “hacked” (he fell victim to a phishing scam) in March 2016, while the DNC reported suspicious activity (the suspected Seth Rich file transfer) in late April, 2016 according to the Washington Post.

On May 18, 2017, Dotcom proposed that if Congress includes the Seth Rich investigation in their Russia probe, he would provide written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was WikiLeaks’ source.

If Congress includes #SethRich case into their Russia probe I’ll give written testimony with evidence that Seth Rich was @Wikileaks source.

On May 19 2017 Dotcom tweeted “I knew Seth Rich. I was involved”

Three days later, Dotcom again released a guarded statement saying “I KNOW THAT SETH RICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE DNC LEAK,” adding:

“I have consulted with my lawyers. I accept that my full statement should be provided to the authorities and I am prepared to do that so that there can be a full investigation. My lawyers will speak with the authorities regarding the proper process.

If my evidence is required to be given in the United States I would be prepared to do so if appropriate arrangements are made. I would need a guarantee from Special Counsel Mueller, on behalf of the United States, of safe passage from New Zealand to the United States and back. In the coming days we will be communicating with the appropriate authorities to make the necessary arrangements. In the meantime, I will make no further comment.”

Dotcom knew.

While one could simply write off Dotcom’s claims as an attention seeking stunt, he made several comments and a series of tweets hinting at the upcoming email releases prior to both the WikiLeaks dumps as well as the publication of the hacked DNC emails to a website known as “DCLeaks.”

In a May 14, 2015 Bloomberg article entitled “Kim Dotcom: Julian Assange Will Be Hillary Clinton’s Worst Nightmare In 2016”: “I have to say it’s probably more Julian,” who threatens Hillary, Dotcom said. “But I’m aware of some of the things that are going to be roadblocks for her.”

Two days later, Dotcom tweeted this:

Hillary Clinton is raising a mountain of cash for her Presidential bid. I think it might turn into ash.

Around two months later, Kim asks a provocative question

Will hackers own the U.S. presidential election and prevent Hillary Clinton? #Wikileaks

Two weeks after that, Dotcom then tweeted “Mishandling classified info is a crime. When Hillary’s emails eventually pop up on the internet who’s going to jail?” 

It should thus be fairly obvious to anyone that Dotcom was somehow involved, and therefore any evidence he claims to have, should be taken seriously as part of Mueller’s investigation. Instead, as Dotcom tweeted, “Special Counsel Mueller is not interested in my evidence. My lawyers wrote to him twice. He never replied.”

via www.zerohedge.com

You might also be interested in:


  1. The ONLY thing mueller is “interested in” is finding SOMETHING he can use against PRESIDENT TRUMP..He is NOT interested in TRUTH. His “team” are ALL DEMOCOMMUNISTS “donors”, and HITLERY/OSCUMBAG lovers.
    He is only “interested” in “protecting” his own HIDE, as he was DEEPLY “involved” with the Uranium one “scandal” that gave 20% of OUR Uranium to an ENEMY. Time to “INVESTIGATE” the INVESTIGATORS, for THEIR CRIMES.

  2. Maybe Podesta should not have answered a phishing email and there would have been no problems for the DNC, but maybe Debbie and the Paki IT fella had something to do with it?

  3. Early on, after Seth Rich’s death, I read several stories regarding the possibility that he downloaded the DNC information and was murdered for doing it. The pieces all fit together perfectly-all one had to do to accept the possibility that someone in the DNC was capable of murder. It just so happens that this is an easy step to take when Hillary is involved (it gets even easier when you read Podesta’s comment almost demanding someone pay the ultimate price for the “hack”). Everyone in the Democrat Party and it’s media went ballistic at the thought. The story of Rich’s death just went away and everyone settled on the Russians did it and Trump colluded. Other computer wizards have discussed the impossibility of hacking based upon the time used (but, don’t even go to the spot where Seth was involved). I think Rich stole the data, gave it to Wickileaks, someone from the DNC killed him for doing it-simplest answer addressing all questions.

  4. I can’t imagine why Mueller wouldn’t want to at least talk to him and find out if he is full of crap or telling the truth. It would seem odd if we didn’t already know that the whole Mueller investigation is a sham!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *